Researched and last reviewed September 2026 · Written by the GiftMeCrypto research desk
The product functions. The pricing is at the expensive end of an already expensive category: a service fee reported at around 9% plus a fixed network charge, with verification appearing at the withdrawal step. It suits a narrow case — a code as a physical gift — and is poor value for anyone who could use an exchange.
- What it is
- Prepaid voucher redeemable for a choice of coins
- Service fee
- ~9% at redemption, per published terms
- Network fee
- Fixed charge on withdrawal
- Verification
- Reported at withdrawal stage
- Sold via
- G2A, Eneba, Kinguin and similar
- Cheaper for bitcoin
- Azteco
The fee stack
Three layers, and only the first is visible when you pay.
| Stage | Charge | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Reseller price over face value | Marketplace-dependent | You may pay above face before anything else |
| Service fee at redemption | ~9% | Deducted from the value credited |
| Network fee on withdrawal | Fixed amount | Proportionally severe on small vouchers |
| Reported all-in, small denomination | up to ~18% | Per publicly posted user accounts |
Swipe sideways →
One publicly posted account describes buying a $30 voucher on a key marketplace and receiving roughly $25 of a stablecoin after a redemption fee and a withdrawal charge — an all-in cost of around 18%. That is consistent with the published fee structure applied to a small denomination, and it illustrates the arithmetic rather than anything unusual.
The verification step
This is the most consistent complaint we find, and it deserves attention because it undermines the main reason people buy vouchers.
Users report being able to redeem a code into a platform balance without documents, then encountering an identity verification requirement when attempting to withdraw coins to an external wallet. If the point of buying a voucher was to avoid verification, the outcome is the worst of both worlds: the voucher premium has been paid and documents are still requested.
- Read the withdrawal terms before purchase, not just the redemption terms
- If you are willing to verify anyway, an exchange is dramatically cheaper
- For bitcoin specifically, a flat-fee voucher avoids the percentage entirely
- Reports also mention wallet or network errors on less common chains — prefer a mainstream network
Where it is sold
Predominantly through third-party key marketplaces — G2A, Eneba, Kinguin and similar — across a range of denominations and currencies, delivered as a digital code by email. Because these are marketplaces rather than the issuer, two consequences follow:
- The price you pay can exceed the voucher's face value, adding a layer before the issuer's own fees.
- Recourse for a failed code runs through the reseller, not the issuer — they hold the purchase record. See our redemption guide for who to contact with what.
Who it actually suits
Reasonable choice if
- You want a physical, giftable code and the object matters
- The recipient chooses their own coin at redemption
- You are buying a large denomination, where the percentage hurts less
- The recipient would never complete an exchange sign-up
Poor choice if
- You have a bank account and could use an exchange
- You are buying a small denomination
- You chose a voucher specifically to avoid verification
- You only want bitcoin — Azteco costs far less
What strikes me reading through user accounts of this product is how few of the complaints are about it failing. The codes work, support responds, the coins arrive. Almost every negative review is about discovering the cost, or the verification requirement, at the point where neither could be avoided.
That is a pattern across the multi-coin voucher category rather than one company's failing — and it points at a single piece of practical advice. Before buying any voucher, open the issuer's fee page and withdrawal terms and read both to the end. Five minutes there is the only moment when that information can change your decision.